"E-Justice": How find mistakes of algorithmic in Laws

All Procedures described in Laws contain mistakes that affect their execution!

Every day we are faced with the procedures described in the laws, and we must follow them.

At the same time, the lawmaker, of course, pays attention to issues requiring regulation (that is, the development of a text describing procedures), but especially omits some aspects, considering them irrelevant.

And, probably, this approach cannot be considered erroneous: as long as the normative legal acts are applied by people, not computers.

But this means that Procedures in the Laws contain the so-called "algorithmic mistakes".

However, the degree of "informatization" in modern society is constantly growing - the number of individual mobile devices that have access to the Internet is steadily increasing.

In the context of jurisprudence, this leads to a constant increase in the demand from society for "wide access to Justice" and "e-justice"

That is, the laws must be such that they can be carried out with the help of computers.

Let's see what an "Algorithmic Procedure" is.

The Procedure is algorithmic if the set of Actions included in the Procedure, their logical sequence, interconnection, and consistency ensure the achievement of the result

So mistakes of algorithmic are:

- confused order of Actions;

- missing Actions;

- Dangling links.

- The action time is not specified.

Do you want to learn how to find such mistakes, and therefore correct and improve the Laws?

I will teach you how to do it.

Examples of converting texts from legislation:

• Australia
• European Union
• and United States